Subscribe to our RSS feed RSS

Follow us on Twitter Follow us

Become a facebook fan Become a fan

Join our e-newsletter Join our e-newsletter

Blog  |  FAQs  |  Contact Us

Home page

We create market opportunities through
sustainable forestry and conservation

Welcome to our blog. Here we discuss pertinent issues and post updates about
Planting Empowerment. Be sure to subscribe to the RSS feed. Enjoy!

"Carbon Baggers"
February 1st, 2010 at 8:10 am

I find it amazing that investors might finance any type of REDD project in Panama at the moment. Panama is at the forefront of REDD and recently received $5MM from the UN-REDD program to further its national REDD program. However, we feel this is still a good five years away from being operational. As I mentioned in a previous post, the legal architecture of who actually owns the carbon in Panama does not exist. Currently the Panamanian government owns the trees, so the thinking with the Torrijos government was that it also owns the carbon in the trees. If I remember correctly, the government owns all minerals, water sources, etc. until they concession it, so this should be the same with carbon.

So when I read about people promoting REDD projects in Panama, it makes me shake my head. Yes, it is possible that you could make it rich. But to me at least, it is like investing in an oil discovery. It might deliver you some great returns for a while, but the landowner/government will soon realize that you are making a ridiculous profit and make a grab for your resource. Panama does a good job in my opinion of promoting foreign direct investment and protecting those investments. However, when a foreigner makes a huge profit because a private/national resource hadn't been adequately regulated by national legislation, he deserves to lose his shirt. We recommend waiting until Panama decides who owns the forest carbon and the rules of the game before making any type of investment. Rainforest communities forfeiting their opportunity to work the forest should receive the majority of the benefits of any REDD project. To me, this means 70-80% with 10-20% going to the government and a small slice to any private project promoter. 

Bookmark and Share

Posted in

< Return to Post List

Estelle Fach
says:
February 10th, 2010 at 4:21 pm

Hi there,

 

The UN-REDD Programme funding is precisely dedicated to capacity building and figuring out the questions you raise! More specifically, I quote from www.un-redd.org) it seeks to : 

 

1.  Establish institutional capacity for the efficient coordination and execution of a REDD programme in Panama:

  • Legal framework for the implementation the REDD National strategy
  • Operational framework for the implementation of the REDD strategy
  • Sectoral, institutional, municipal and individual capacity strengthened
  • A valid and operational system of payment and distribution of benefits
  • Stakeholders consultation process

2. Technical capacity to monitor, measure, report and verify the reduction of emissions from deforestation and forest degradation:

  • A national inventory and monitoring system for forests and carbon
  • A reference emission scenario
  • An accounting system for carbon and for generating information on emissions
Name *
Email *
Type text you see*

 RSS feed

August  2010
July  2010
June  2010
May  2010
April  2010
March  2010
February  2010
January  2010
December  2009

YOUR OPPORTUNITY

 

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER

For older news, please visit the archives page

Environmental Activism Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory


Site map

Translate this page

Terms and Conditions

Privacy Policy

Connect with Us

 

Become a Facebook fan

Follow Planting Empowerment on Twitter Follow Planting Empowerment feeds in an RSS reader Watch Planting Empowerment videos on YouTube View photos of Planting Empwowerment